It is irrefutable that media has been considered as one of the most major elements to determine the outcome of an election. First of all, an election cannot leave the help from social media, such as television, radio and internet. In this case, using these types of media can spread the information and process of the election wider and more efficient. For example, during the election between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in 2012 president race, media, television and internet in particular, broadcast each debate they have to all of the
Skeptics, however, disagree with the above perspectives. In their opinion, every vote comes from the result of resident’s consideration. It has nothing to do with the influence on the media. Internet and television are just ways to get information about different parties. However, every vote is the result of debating inside one’s mind, whether vote for this party or the other. Secondly, the debate between the party’s leaders and the celebrities is more accurate and essential than the arguing between some random people talk on the media. Therefore, skeptics insist that only the debates between the campaign celebrities are worth to listen and listen. Lastly, fake messages that are made for attacking certain parties purposely are crucial to be aware of. One of the disadvantages of the media is that any information can be provided for the residents. Consequently, not relying on social media is the best method to avoid this type of situation.
In view of both justifications, it is fair to say that media can be a major factor of an election’s outcome. The efficiency of the modern media helps citizens to save time, but also gather more information as they wanted. However, at the same time, it is also vital to beware of the false or fake messages about certain parties. As a result, we could conclude that election is a personal voting thing. Nevertheless, with out the support of the media, the results of the election can be vary.
It is a bit hard to understand what you are trying to point out (eg. 'an election cannot leave the help from social media'?). I disagree with your statement that
ReplyDelete'It is irrefutable that media has been considered as one of the most major elements to determine the outcome of an election.'
You are saying that media is a big part to determining who wins an election. Have you heard of the recent unexpected and overwhelming Liberal victory in our provincial election? The media, specifically Pollster, had concluded that the NDP would have a 45% win compared to the Liberal's 36% support, but that did not happen at all (rather the opposite). I do agree that the media lets us people have more insight into the election details and debates, but I don't think it is such a big part of the real results. Also, I think when you say 'celebrities', you mean the candidates right? Your third paragraph is a bit confusing. There is lots of random info; who cares if SKEPTICS think you should only listen to the real candidate debate, you are trying to explain how the media in general effects elections. I don't understand how the conclusion of your third paragraph relates to the topic. Your essay is very informative of both views.
Oh yeah, my reference to the pollster thing is from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2013/05/15/bc-election-pollsters-wrong.html , or you can just google it.
DeleteYou sound veey confident in your essay, which is good because it convinces the readers to agree with you. However, I found this essay a little hard to read and understand. The first thing I noticed was that you chose to call the candidates "celebrities" which did indeed confuse me a little. And I personally didnt like the fact that you started out saying that media does have an influence on the votes but in your second paragraph, you talked about how media does not really have a big influence on the votes. This really confused of which side you were agreeing to and disagreeing with. I think it would've been better if you just chose one side and strongly supported it instead of supporting both sides with weak points.
ReplyDeleteOther than the minor mistakes (second paragraph : "last and last" ?? ) the essay had a good structure and I enjoyed reading it =)