Thursday, April 11, 2013
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Introduction to Shakespeare
William
Shakespeare had his first child 4 months after his marriage.
William
Shakespeare had three children. Susanna was born in May 1583, six months after the wedding of
her parents Anne Hathaway and William Shakespeare.
He made plays,
poems and sonnets.
Obviously he wrote a lot of plays, poems and sonnets.
Famous Plays: Hamlet, Romeo
and Juliet, Julius Caesar…
Famous Poems: A Lover's
Complaint , Phoenix and
the Turtle…
Famous Sonnets: When in
disgrace with fortune, Let me not to
the marriage of true minds…
A website for
learning about William Shakespeare
lots of information in here:
Where do we share or write on the google doc for the Shakespeare points/questions??
I couldn't find the one Ms.Lees supposedly shared with us? O_o Or did I not listen clear enough? Help pleaseeeeeee.
My 2 questions and sources:
William Shakespeare (2 points/1 source) Alison WU
My 2 questions and sources:
William Shakespeare (2 points/1 source) Alison WU
INTRODUCTION TO SHAKESPEARE
Introduction
to Shakespeare
1.
He died on the same day he was born.
How William Shakespeare died is
unknown for now, but it seems fitting that he died on April 23rd, the same date
given for his birth.
http://www.arogundade.com/when-where-and-how-did-william-shakespeare-die-what-caused-william-shakespeares-death.html
2.
He also acted in his own plays
William Shakespeare did indeed act
in his own plays. However, it is not known exactly how many roles Shakespeare
played himself. It is assumed that Shakespeare played smaller roles in a
variety of his own plays, including As You Like It (Adam), Macbeth (King Duncan),
Henry IV (King Henry), and Hamlet (Hamlet's father).
http://absoluteshakespeare.com/trivia/facts/facts.htm
3.
He married a merchant's daughter
This I could not find a exact
answer and a reasonable source. However, according to Wikipedia, he was married
to a farmer's daughter; Anne Hathaway.
Monday, April 8, 2013
Shakespeare Facts, Myths, and Questions
Here are my three points:
1. Who was Shakespeare's sponsor?
> Technically, King James I of England should be Shakespeare's sponsor. He was fond of arts and brought Shakespeare's acting company under his patronage. King James I also granted Shakespeare's company a Royal Patent and changed their name from the Lord Chamberlain's Men to the King's men.
Source: http://www.shakespeare-online.com/faq/kingsmen.html
2. Shakespeare was baptized three days after he was born.
> Confirmed, he was guessed to be born three days before he was baptized on April 26th, 1564, in the Holy Trinity Church.
Source: http://absoluteshakespeare.com/trivia/faq/faq.htm
3. What was Shakespeare's favourite colour?
> Unfortunately, there is no historical evidence that recorded his favourite colour, or any other of his likes and dislikes. At that time, it seemed irrelevant to write about these things. In fact, we barely know.anything about what he did as a child.
Source: http://www.nosweatshakespeare.com/resources/shakespeare-childhood/
Also, this website contains lots of useful information and facts about Shakespeare: http://absoluteshakespeare.com/index.htm
1. Who was Shakespeare's sponsor?
> Technically, King James I of England should be Shakespeare's sponsor. He was fond of arts and brought Shakespeare's acting company under his patronage. King James I also granted Shakespeare's company a Royal Patent and changed their name from the Lord Chamberlain's Men to the King's men.
Source: http://www.shakespeare-online.com/faq/kingsmen.html
2. Shakespeare was baptized three days after he was born.
> Confirmed, he was guessed to be born three days before he was baptized on April 26th, 1564, in the Holy Trinity Church.
Source: http://absoluteshakespeare.com/trivia/faq/faq.htm
3. What was Shakespeare's favourite colour?
> Unfortunately, there is no historical evidence that recorded his favourite colour, or any other of his likes and dislikes. At that time, it seemed irrelevant to write about these things. In fact, we barely know.anything about what he did as a child.
Source: http://www.nosweatshakespeare.com/resources/shakespeare-childhood/
Also, this website contains lots of useful information and facts about Shakespeare: http://absoluteshakespeare.com/index.htm
Shakespeare Stuff
Some fun and informative links to Shakespeare and information about him.
http://www.folger.edu/template.cfm?cid=588
http://www.shakespeare-online.com/
Was Shakespeare gay?Shakespeare wrote 154 sonnets, apparently not intended for publication. The majority of these sonnets address the poet's love for a young man. There is no historical evidence to indicate Shakespeare was bisexual or homosexual; he was a married man with three children. However, the poet's intense romantic feelings for the young man in the sonnets have led some to believe Shakespeare was having a homosexual affair.
http://www.folger.edu/template.cfm?cid=588
http://www.shakespeare-online.com/
Was Shakespeare gay?Shakespeare wrote 154 sonnets, apparently not intended for publication. The majority of these sonnets address the poet's love for a young man. There is no historical evidence to indicate Shakespeare was bisexual or homosexual; he was a married man with three children. However, the poet's intense romantic feelings for the young man in the sonnets have led some to believe Shakespeare was having a homosexual affair.
But is the speaker of the sonnets expressing Shakespeare's personal feelings? Does the young man belong solely to the realm of fantasy, as do Falstaff and the Three Witches? Since we do not know the answers, critics often choose to refer to the speaker of the sonnets as simply "the poet", to illustrate that he is a character, and not necessarily William Shakespeare. For much more on this topic, please see the commentary for Sonnet 20 and Sonnet 75.
THIS IS FROM THIS SITE: http://www.shakespeare-online.com/biography/shakespearetopquestions.html
Friday, March 15, 2013
Response to "No Blue Pill, No Red Pill" by Ana Christina Pratas
Response
to "No Blue Pill, No Red Pill" by Ana Christina Pratas
The constant modern development
makes education a necessity for survival. Nowadays, strong education leads to a
significantly better future. However, even after realizing this, many students
suffer to motivate themselves to learn. Hence, teachers step in to do their
duty of inspiring the students for motivation towards learning.
"Learning may be social, but
in the end its individual." I am in total agreement with this quote. Social
interaction is a crucial part of learning, however, without the learner's will
for education, learning no longer exist. As mentioned in the article "It
is the inspiration and not the motivation that an educator may trigger among
learners" thing means, only oneself has the ability to trigger the motivation
within himself/herself. In other words, it is not the teacher's duty to get their
students to 'want' to learn. It is the students' duty to motivate themselves.
“If you can see it, you can achieve it." Motivation is the key to a
successful education and the most powerful tool for motivation is vitalization
of your goal. This goes beyond having an idea of what you want to accomplish,
however, constantly imaging yourself at your goal.
There is
no recipe, no secrets, no short cuts. Learning takes time and effort, however,
without the motivation, all time and effort will be wasted in no time. As
mentioned in the article, in reality, "Learning is hard
work. There are no red pills. There are no blue pills." However, also in
reality, as soon as you grasp the motivation to learn, the 'hard work' can pass
by like nothing. Because "If you can see it, you can achieve it".
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Reply option?
Does the reply option for comments work for any of you guys? It's not working for me, just wanted to know. Also I need some help on how to make reply work. =.="
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Response to “No Red Pill No Blue Pill”
The post “No Red Pill No Blue Pill” is written by a educator who is frustrated in teaching. It analyzes the processes and problems of learning in a particular writing style, in an attempt to regain her lost motivation.
The writing style of this
post was unique and appealing in many ways. Its brief, narrative, and first person story-telling
style used in the introduction and conclusion was effective in adding “life”
into the post. It also helped express your frustrated feelings vividly. This
certainly explains why your “recipe” to help student make connections and learn
is by stories. Next, the usage of visuals in your post aided my understanding
of your ideas, while also making the post less dull. One thing I would suggest
is that maybe you could try to place the visuals so that

they
don’t
look
like
this.
don’t
look
like
this.
Occasionally, it may slightly disturb my
reading. Finally, the text to text/world connections you made to “The Matrix”
and the webinar discussion were quite thought inducing. Overall, I really liked
the style of your post and the way it conveyed your ideas.
Lots
of great ideas were shown in the post, most of which I can really relate to. An
example is your idea of “Learning may be social, but in the end it is individual.”
Yes, of course we learn at school - English, mathematics, socials, and sciences
– but in the end, why do some students excel while others do not? As you wrote,
“Learning, assimilating skills and information is left to the individual.”
That final process of absorbing is still done by oneself. Later on, you
discussed the eight steps of learning, more specifically, the passion portion. In a
student’s view, I would think of motivation as part of the “push”. In my
opinion, passion is the initial excitement that causes us to begin the process of education while the push or motivation is the power that helps us continue on
that journey. Also, I think that it is the educator’s job to constantly remind
us of that passion.
In the next part of your post, you talked about the transition between high school and higher education. I was especially interested in the part where you wrote about “accountability” and “responsibility”. After doing some research, I came up with an explanation. Accountability is induced responsibility, you do something because others – teachers, in this case - require you to do it. On the other hand, responsibility is taking up something according to your conscience. I also found a picture that Dean Shareski posted:
Understanding these differences further helped me interpret the next idea
you presented. I realized that high school education to university education is jumping from accountability to responsibility. Instead of constant supervision from a teacher,
we are expected to adopt the self motivated, self-governed, and autonomous way
of learning. However, I disagree that “learning hurts”. Although I understand
why you think that the rote to digital learning, resistance to change, and fear
to be factors that make leaning painful, I personally look at learning as
exploration and challenge. Exploring the unknown landscape involves lots of
hard work, but when you make a stunning discovery, that joy, that
accomplishment - it is all yours.
Spring.
I
run in the field, sun in my eyes. Grass glisten from melted frost.
All
around me, I see my own kind. Some are running with me. Others, struggling, yet
slowly rising from hibernation. Rest is good, but it is time to start again.
No
blue pill. No red pill.
Just
reality.
Just
education.
Just
life.
Monday, March 11, 2013
Response to Ana Cristina's "No Red Pill No Blue Pill" Article
“Learning
is hard work. There are no red pills. There are no blue pills.” This was stated
by the author, Ana Cristina, in the beginning of the article No Red Pill No Blue Pill. In the article
that she hyper-linked Red pill and blue pill, these two pills symbolizes the choice between the blissful ignorance
of illusion (the blue pill) and taking the painful truth of reality (the red
pill).
I
disagree with that line she said in the beginning of her article. She clearly
stated in the middle of her article, “Learning hurts.” Isn't this the same as
the red pill, where we embrace the painful, hard truth of learning? This
further confused me when she said “Red pill. Blue pill.” in the end of the
article. Did she mean that there is a red pill and blue pill when it comes to
learning?
“Learning
may be social, but in the end it is individual.” I agree with this statement.
She says that the process of how one person learns, being it in a classroom
environment, in the library alone, is left to the individual themselves. It doesn't matter how much a teacher may push you to learn something, if you don’t want to
learn it, or stay ignorant of it, then there will be no evident learning shown.
On the other hand, if they are willing to learn something, out of their own
interest, then they will learn more. This is true, even in me. I love searching
up things and learning about things that I enjoy, it seems that I sometimes
learn even more than what I learn in class sometimes. This also goes back to
the red pill, blue pill reference. If a person is unwilling to learn about
something, aren't they staying ignorant of that topic, believing what they want
instead? This refers to the blue pill.
What
does being an “Autonomous Learner” mean? According to the picture that the
author included in her article, it shows four main parts that you need to have
so you will be “college ready”, key cognitive strategies, academic knowledge
and skills, contextual stills and awareness, and academic behavior These are
demanded from students once they enter higher grades and post-secondary school.
I think that these things are important and being an autonomous learner is very
important. If you cannot stand on your own two feet, who can you lean on? I
believe that leaning on others is not always good because they may not always
be there for you. Being able to work and learn independently is essential for
future success.
The
author’s writing style is very interesting. She uses some sentences where they
can stand alone with no description to back it up, yet I still can understand
many things from it. The very first word of the article (excluding title) is “Spring.”
Spring makes me think of being beauty, a chance to start again, and most of
all, a new beginning where everything is fresh. There are many metaphors in
this article, comparing bridges to learning, and fear as unknown landscapes. The
main metaphor in this article was the red pill, blue pill comparing it to the
way of learning.
This pictures gives me a feel of fresh, and a new start.
“Red pills.
Blue pills.” This tells you that you can perceive learning in two ways. Being
ignorant and believing in only what you believe, or taking in everything you
can, takings risks knowing that the road you tread may be thorn-filled and painful.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
